Category: Chris Prescher

Objects in Red Light

There is no form. There are no lines, no shapes, no objects; only color. Everything is comprised of paint brush size pixels of color, of individual unblended chips of paint spread across the canvas. The painter is merely an algorithm that sees a square of color in the subject, and transmits it to the canvas, but in doing so, discovers something uniquely beautiful.

Continue Reading Below

ChrisPrescherPortfolio-4-2.jpg

initials1-e1546122471253.jpg

 

This was the mission assigned by Professor Sheesley.  We were then presented with a still life of white objects bathed in red light.  Following in the footsteps of the impressionists, we were charged with exploring the rich diversity of color present in a seemingly monochromatic field of view. The objects were not just red, but an assortment of oranges, reds, pinks, creams, peaches, yellows, burgundies, and violets. The shadows are not merely grey and black, but an inverse of the red light source, with a variety of greens in different tones and shades.

This approach to painting was initiated by the impressionists, and more specifically by the pointillists such as Georges Seurat and Paul Signac, over a hundred years before the first color printer evoked a near identical process. Even the majority of digital image storage still utilizes a series of pixel patterns, or bitmaps, rendering pictures as a series of small dots of color.

The true beauty of the process is revealed when a chaotic seemingly meaningless mix of color swatches placed randomly all over the canvas begin to coalesce together into a stunning rendition of the subject material. The painter’s opinion is removed from the equation, and the image forms itself from the scientific application of color across the canvas. The result is a desire not to contrive a personal masterpiece, but to recreate the moments of splendor in the world as many times as possible.  This serial approach is best displayed in one of my favorite collections, Claude Monet’s Rouen Cathedral Series, a collection of 31 canvases of the Gothic Rouen Cathedral in different lighting and weather conditions.

My small and sloppy attempt is nothing more than a cheap imitation of the masterful work Monet and his fellow impressionists created.  That being said, the project continues to be immensely beneficial for my understanding of light and color, having sharpened my eye for the beautiful visual nuance present all around me.

Review: The Christmas Chronicles (2018)

WARNING: Potential Spoilers Ahead

2.0 / 5.0

MV5BNTA3NjU3OTM2MV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNjQ2MzE1NjM@._V1_UX182_CR0,0,182,268_AL_

This film has all the qualities you would expect from a straight-to-streaming-release Christmas film. It is rife with cheesy cliches, moments of questionable acting, predictable plot points, forgettable characters, and inconsistent tone.  Despite all its flaws, The Christmas Chronicles is a strange but mostly entertaining addition to the ever growing list of holiday b-movies for one main reason: Kurt Russell.

Kurt truly shines, proving my theory that every movie would be drastically improved by casting him, as he dives into the Christmas cinematic universe as one of my favorite renditions of Santa Claus to date.  If my review was based solely on his performance, the movie would earn 5 stars. Unfortunately, there are moments where Kurt Russell is absent, and the movie suffers greatly.

Without Kurt’s Kris Kringle, The Christmas Chronicles is better described as a chronic case of Christmas cliches. The film is a bland rehashing of Christmas movie tropes, including a forgettable “here is how bad your life could turn out without the Christmas Spirit™” involving one of the two child protagonists, complete with the one dimensional violent bad guy to show what the absence of that Christmas Spirit™ can do.

The writers do not stop here, leaning into this trope, going as far as blaming all instances of deep human suffering from the dark ages to World War II on this lack of Christmas Spirit™.  The solution to this epidemic that plagues all of humanity? Just believe in Santa Claus. It is an odd decision that is incredibly off putting, tonally inconsistent, and unnecessary. Its either poor nonsensical writing, or a shallow pessimistic attempt to critique religious belief.

Overall, The Christmas Chronicles title being plural is appropriate, as it feels like multiple different movies smashed together in one. It has elements of the hallmark/lifetime Christmas movies full of sappy emotion but lacking depth, along with trippy action-packed hyperspace travel, fantastical magic abilities, a bizarre Kurt Russell musical number in a jail cell, and strange one-foot-tall CGI elves.

The movies eccentric and at times outright outlandish natures makes it oddly charming. I would not be surprised if the movie attracts an annual cult following. By no means do I see it as a quality film, but it is incredibly unique. The creators take risks, and the result is worth adding to the pantheon of wacky zany Christmas movies.

Like this review? Go to my Rotten Tomatoes profile and nominate me as a super reviewer!

Review: Ralph Breaks the Internet (2018)

WARNING: Potential Spoilers Ahead

4.0 / 5.0

220px-Ralph_Breaks_the_Internet_(2018_film_poster)

The sequel to the underappreciated Wreck-It Ralph follows in its predecessor’s footsteps by delivering an experience that truly appeals to viewers of all ages, showing that you can make an entertaining children’s film that has depth, satire, and social commentary.

The film looks beautiful, and the journey of Vanellope and Ralph through the internet is presented in a fun and whimsical fashion. Many moments seem to draw a lot from other films, especially Ready Player One, but due to its often satirical tone and tendency to parody other movies, it warrants a pass for the borrowed aspects.

Despite 5 years passing since I last saw Wreck It Ralph, I was instantly invested and transported by the opening scene with Ralph and Vanellope, drawn in not by visual spectacle and action, but instead by complex well portrayed characters. In a blockbuster world where style is forced over substance and story, as studios chase profit by creating franchises, it was refreshing to watch a sequel that prioritized the characters, developing emotional connections and narrative arcs first. The only thing that took me out of the film was when Disney stopped to gloat over owning a massive chunk of the entertainment world.

When the movie gets to its action, jokes, and references, they feel earned since I truly care about Ralph and Vanellope, and enjoy seeing them interact in this new universe. Furthermore, as the plot develops, the writers keep the focus on the characters. Not only do they avoid chasing the macguffin, but the film intentionally sets up several quests as diversions, only to subvert them in the end when it reveals that the real villain the entire time is Ralph’s insecurity, toxic possessiveness, and resistance to change.

In addition to the main theme of toxic insecurity and control, there is the poignant message when the refugees from Sugar Rush need empathy, support, and provision from the other characters. The commentaries on the sexist treatment of previous Disney princesses is also effective, although awkward when you realize Disney is making the commentary to continue to sell merchandise for its problematic properties. Overall the film avoids the overt and cliche winks to the camera, while simultaneously retaining the impact of its underlying messages. 

Like this review? Go to my Rotten Tomatoes profile and nominate me as a super reviewer!

Review: Poseidon (2006)

2.0 / 5.0

download

From the beginning Poseidon felt like a shameless and cynical cash grab attempting to dredge the depths for any ounce of profit left behind by Titanic (1997). Trying to ride the wave of Perfect Storm, Poseidon ends up feeling like the premise for Titanic was jammed into the universe of the Final Destination movies.

Death is fetishized in the first act, as the passengers and crew of the luxury cruise liner are brutally killed.  The film presents their deaths not with the dramatic and emotional impact of Titanic, but with the almost comical feel of a slasher, where the end goal is a pissing contest to see who can come up with the most creative and original way to dispatch their characters.

While not my cup of tea, the Final Destination series and many slashers films at least remain tonally consistent by leaning into this premise effectively. Poseidon, on the other hand, strays from this quickly.  The film turns from aquatic horror to dramatic action adventure, and I am expected to suddenly start caring for the remaining wooden, underdeveloped characters after just seeing the glamorized deaths of the other wooden, underdeveloped characters.

This unappealing tonal inconsistency is not aided by the poor script. Most of the cast have performed much better in other works, so it’s hard to place much of the blame on the acting, especially considering the poorly written dialogue. Every time characters are talking on screen the film feels lost and confused, desiring nothing but the next action set piece.

This is understandable though, as the special and practical effects are by far the greatest strength of Poseidon. While the cold indifference shown to the brutal slaughter of hundreds of people was incredibly off-putting, showing all the empathy and subtlety of a Michael Bay film, it is a visual marvel. The set pieces are incredibly complex, and yet the movement is captivating and easy to follow.

It must be pointed out that in addition to the technical genius displayed in the effects, Kurt Russell’s performance is phenomenal. He dazzles with his hallmark charisma and charm, giving a believable performance while the rest of the script falls apart around him. He genuinely seems to be just having a great time, while simultaneously being fully aware of what kind of movie this is. While it is by no means a good movie, watching Kurt Russell reprise his role as the quintessential action star in masterfully designed set pieces makes it at least an entertaining movie.

Like this review? Go to my Rotten Tomatoes profile and nominate me as a super reviewer!

Review: Cloud Atlas (2012)

2.5 / 5.0 

cloud atlas

At its peak, Cloud Atlas feels as if the cast simply got together for a jam sesh where they alternated between a diverse list of characters, experimenting and testing their range. In this regard, the film has many strong moments. Captivating performances, especially from Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, Hugo Weaving, and Doona Bae, are paired with beautiful visuals, and well crafted practical and special effects.

Unfortunately for Cloud Atlas, it is not just an A-list actors’ jam session, but instead a feature length (and then some) film. As such, it really falls flat, fumbling the 6 concurring stories, jolting the viewer to and fro as it violently whisks them through the time-space continuum. The film was a slog, disorientating and distracting from its strengths, and substantially weakening the thematic payoff at the end.

Now it must be said that this task of fitting 6 distinct arcs into one film is an onerous one that may have turned out much worse in the hands of less visionary filmmakers. That being said, the Wachowskis would have been much better served employing a narrative structure closer to the Coen brothers’ Ballad of Buster Scruggs, which presents each arc fully before proceeding to the next, allowing the viewer to make the thematic connections them self. This would have been more inline with David Mitchell’s novel, which only cut each of the first five stories once, and presented the 6th unbroken.

Instead, Cloud Atlas mutilates each arc with more cuts than I could count, before force feeding the connecting theme and overarching philosophy down the viewer’s throat, like Dr. Goose delivering poison to Adam Ewing. It left a bad taste in my mouth, as if the film had a contempt for the viewer, seeing them as stupid and shallow, unable or unwilling to understand the film’s theme unless it was violently shoved in their face.

Like this review? Go to my Rotten Tomatoes profile and nominate me as a super reviewer!

Review: The Sound of Music (1965)

5.0 / 5.0 

Sound of Music

Through the first two thirds of run time, The Sound of Music is a charming and complete love story:  however, it is the powerful third act that puts it over the top. The Von Trapp Family, led by Maria and the Captain, shows what it looks like when pride in one’s heritage and country is based not on tribalistic feelings of superiority and supremacy, but instead on a commitment to a moral and ethical truth. In presenting the duality of lighthearted music alongside dramatic suspense, rooted in unwavering moral integrity, the film strikes a consistent tone that flows seamlessly from beginning to end.

The Sound of Music is truly an artistic masterpiece that feels ahead of its time, and would surely warrant Academy consideration if it were released today.  It sports an iconic soundtrack, phenomenal performances from both leading and supporting actors, beautiful cinematography, and a brilliantly woven narrative teeming with powerful themes that are just as relevant over half a century later.

Julie Andrews as the lead character Maria is practically flawless. She fully embodies both the youthful whimsy and insightful wisdom of Maria, hitting every note in both her singing and acting. Julie presents a brilliant role model who is strong, independent, righteous, and confident, never wavering from this strength and leadership, even when the film pursues her romantic arc with Christopher Plummer’s Captain Von Trapp.

Despite the eponymous sounds of music being the driving force, the creators do not flee from the use of rests, as the film pulses with energy beyond just the score. Actors deliver poignant and nuanced performances, allowing the subtleties of facial expression and body language to convey much more than words and notes alone.  The film crackles with tension in its moments of silence, such as the cemetery chase scene. The visuals of not only the astonishing Austrian mountains, but also of the abbey and the Von Trapp manor, are phenomenal, rivaling even the best contemporary cinematography.

Like this review? Go to my Rotten Tomatoes profile and nominate me as a super reviewer!

Iron Man

As a child, I had never really been exposed to comic books, having been born after their initial hayday, I grew up in the 90s when television and video games cemented themselves as the central sources of my childhood entertainment. I lived a life oblivious to the expansive, imaginative, and magnificent worlds that Stan Lee and others at Marvel had painstakingly brought to life on paper, until 2008 when those worlds broke through onto the big screen. In theaters, I witnessed the character of Tony Stark brought to life by Robert Downey Jr., and I discovered my favorite superhero.

Continue Reading Below

Iron Man

initials1-e1546122471253.jpg

When I began writing this entry a few weeks ago, Stan Lee was still alive. This post was just another chapter in the small but growing catalog of my artistic and literary work.  Then, November 12th, days before my scheduled date to post this to my website, Stan, a pillar of not only comic books, but of modern storytelling, passed away. This sent me back to the drawing board, as this piece became more than just an individual chapter in my own narrative, but instead my tribute to an artist and a man who has greatly inspired me.  When Stan Lee (born Stanley Martin Leiber), began work in the comics industry, the occupation was so looked down upon by society, that all his writing was done under the pseudonym Stan Lee (later adopted as his legal name). His vision, passion, and creativity showed the world the good work that could be done through art and story, as his creations became cultural cornerstones that transcended the comic book industry.

It was more than just the action-packed badass nature of the film that drew me in, though: it was something deeper.  Now don’t get me wrong, I was fascinated by the action packed sequences; I was inspired by a hero who used intelligence and science to construct fantastic weapons and technology; I was enamored by the grit of a person with their back against the wall triumphing against the odds and thwarting the bad guys.  However, what truly captivated me, and caused me to stick to Iron Man while other narratives with similar elements fell by the wayside, was the poignant redemption arc.

To begin the film, Tony Stark was not a hero.  He was selfish arrogant narcissist. He was a womanizer, a war profiteer, and an all-american prick displaying some of the worst aspects of humanity.  Time and time again he displayed complete disdain for the well-being of anyone not named Tony Stark, as he led a life that not only disregarded the well-being of others in favor of himself, but actively took part in destroying that well-being to advance his own security, his own significance, and his own satisfaction.  Despite these numerous character flaws, he is given opportunity to change. By experiencing a taste of the pain, suffering, and injustice he has caused in the lives of millions of people, and being brought face to face with the humanity of those victimized by his actions, he finds redemption.

This message resonated with my 15 year old self.  While I’ve since learned that this drastic transformation cannot be done simply through the individual grit or the personal intelligence displayed by Tony Stark, the tale of selfish schmuck undeservedly turned spectacular hero has nevertheless continued to captivate me as it takes on new meaning. In high school, this motivated me to depict Stan Lee’s creation with my own hand, full of large messy brush strokes and abstracted forms.  Today, Stan Lee’s vision inspires me to make more than just cheap imitations, but to make my own original creations, and to carry on Stan’s catchphrase: “Excelsior!” – Ever upward!